English 10 Honors
Mrs. Nass
People cannot experience being human without individuality. The general public in Brave New World
is not truly content because they cannot experience all that life has to offer. Aldous Huxley once expressed that he wrote to
be more himself, to be more of an individual. (Huxley
“Individuality”) Huxley wrote Brave
New World as an argument for individualism, as established by the
discontent of individuals in the technologically controlled society of Brave
New World, the fact that people in the World State are not truly living the
human experience, and that their freedom is sacrificed for health and
comfort. Huxley demonstrates that when
technology overrules society, individualism is lost.
Brave
New World is universally known as a book showing an example of scientific
progress actually harming the populace, the individual.
“Huxley’s Brave New World is one of
the most important novels of the twentieth century. In many
parts of the world, its title has become
a catchphrase for the misuse of the technology to subdue the individual and
manufacture an artificial happiness” (O’Neil 601). Brave
New World presents the state of
the World in 623 A.F., 623 years after Henry Ford died.
Society has been overrun by technology,
allowing people to have complete security, comfort, and happiness. Huxley conveys
life without technology through a reservation of people who are not ruled by
the World State. A boy born (note that in the World State,
childbirth is considered taboo) to parents raised in the World State is brought
up inside of the reservation. No one
completely accepts him in the reservation, and neither does anyone in the World
State once he is taken there. He and two
other characters simply are not satisfied with society in the World State. Despite the World State’s best efforts to place
everyone perfectly into society, they simply refuse to or do not fit in. Helmholtz is a character too creative for his
assigned job as a catchphrase author and Bernard Marx desires time alone with
himself. Spending time alone is
considered taboo by the World State, and Helmholtz isn’t allowed to change his
preset role; he cannot expand and improve his field, for that could cause
rebellion and less control. There will
always be individuals, no matter how hard one tries to suppress them, these
individuals are rejected by society and are promptly sent to an island with the
rest of the outcast individuals. These
individuals were discontent under the government of the State because they did
not have freedom.
People
in the technologically controlled society of the State miss out on the grand
experiences being human has to offer, because forming one’s own personality,
interests, likes, dislikes, body, and family are all things worth experiencing. The general public in Brave New World is
not allowed to develop themselves as we do now as shown
in this scene where (John) the outcast’s mother (whose name is Linda) is
talking about his curiosity. “There’s so
much one doesn’t know; it wasn’t my business to know. I mean,
when a child asks you how a
helicopter works or who made the world—well, what are you to answer if you’re a
Beta and have always worked in the Fertilizing Room?” (Huxley 122).
If Linda had been able to choose what to do
and learn herself in life, perhaps she would have known the answer to John’s
question, therefore bringing the two of them closer together, bringing them
happiness. The citizens living in Brave New World’s World State live in
a very advanced society, and their interests, likes, body, work, children etc. are
formed for them by the government; they themselves were stripped of these
valuable experiences. “Sentiments,
ideas, and practices which liberate the human spirit find no place in Huxley’s
scientific utopia and are, in fact, put down as harmful to the stability of the
community. Parentage, family, and home
become obsolete; sex is denuded of all its mystery and significance” (Magill
1405). Sex is mysterious and significant
in any man or woman’s life, but in the State, sex is merely a tool for keeping
people happy, nothing more. The World
State’s psychological conditioning is what abducts the significance and mystery
from sex. If the State citizen’s are constantly bombarded
with happiness, then individuals in a technologically controlled society do not
desire to advance the state of humanity, if no citizens are trying to improve
their life, then humans are not progressing.
“Essentially, the new world applies the principle of mass production to
people. Huxley saw the danger in what he
called technological idolatry, a belief that technological advance
automatically means human progress” (O’Neil 612). As
demonstrated with the State—a place which
is now effectively frozen in time. The
people cannot improve under these conditions, and if they do not satisfy the
human desire to improve themselves, they will become discontent.
Individuals
in the technologically controlled society of the World State are discontent
because technology strips them of their freedom and gives them nothing but
happiness to replace it. Sole happiness
does not bring deep contentment to the citizens, because they are missing out
on rest life has to offer, things like love, wisdom, intelligence, awkwardness,
and solemnity. The populace in Brave
New World is forced into happiness with Soma and interminable entertainment. These cause their discontent; they are not
experiencing all of the emotions people have been given.
Neither do they have freedom, because they
gave it up in exchange for niceties like perfect health, no pain, and no
sadness. Things that could potentially
cause discomfort were discouraged by the World State ”Our
Freud had been the first to reveal the appalling dangers of family life. The world was full of fathers- was therefore
full of misery; full of mothers- therefore of every kind of perversion from
sadism to chastity” (Huxley 39). That is
why the people are discontent, because key things, such as chastity and parents,
are completely stripped from the people, simply because they can cause
discomfort or sickness. These things the
World State forbids are very important, and mustn’t be lost, otherwise one will
not find rewarding life. Though one
would believe everlasting happiness to be satisfying, if this happiness is
artificial, one is not experiencing all life has to offer.
Huxley feels the citizens are living without
purpose “A recurring theme in his work is the egocentricity of the people of
the twentieth century, their ignorance of any reality transcending the self,
their loneliness and despair, and their pointless and sordid existence.” (Magill
1399) If humans
find no greater purpose to their existence, the search for love and wisdom becomes
futile. The people living in the World
State are living without purpose, and therefore are discontent.
If individualism is promoted, the people of
the World State would be able to find purpose for their lives, because one
cannot feel that they have truly succeeded or accomplished anything worthwhile
when they are not in control of their life.
However, in a society where technology plays such a key role in daily
life, people find ways to control everyone else, and that limits how much one
person can differ from his neighbor.
When
technology overrules society, individualism is lost, as this is the case in Brave
New World. “You will see that no
offence is so heinous as unorthodoxy of behavior. Murder
kills only the individual, after all,
what is an individual?’ With a sweeping
gesture he indicated the rows of microscopes, the test tubes, the
incubators.’ We can make a new one with
the greatest ease-as many as we like” (Huxley 148). Clearly,
the World State cares more about how
many people there are, and what they are doing, than the actual people themselves. They are willing to kill, and just as easily
create a replacement. No value is placed
on the individuals themselves. “By
various methods of psychological conditioning, they are trained to live in
total identification with society and to shun all activities that threaten the
stability of the community” (Magill 1617).
There comes a point where technology allows for complete control over
the development of people—in the interest of stability.
However, controlling the development of
humans in such a uniform manner completely stunts individuality because
everyone is given the same set of experiences.
Having vastly different experiences than those around you is the very
definition of individualism. Control
limits one’s freedoms.
By
sacrificing freedom for health and comfort for the luxuries of genetic
modification (perfect health) and babies solely being produced by the
government (no one has to experience the pains of childbirth– natural
reproduction is disallowed), the State people are placed into a cookie cutter
mold and are trained to be the same.
These citizens are not allowed freedom, and without freedom, one cannot
be an individual. The State controlled
the people through subtle training that had profound effect. “By various methods of psychological
conditioning, they are trained to live in total identification with society and
to shun all activities that threaten the stability of the community.” (Magill
1617) Ultimately, without freedom, one is only good to die, because life cannot
be improved. Huxley lamented the idea of
a completely scientific, and so he wrote about it in order to show its
horrors. “In the first of these novels,
Huxley, defrauded of the hope his grandfather had felt that science would
create a new and better world, protested the obliteration of all human values
by a society completely controlled by science” (Moody 431).
Freedom is an essential human value that was
stripped of the State’s citizens, this clearly did not improve the lives of the
people. “By his heretical views on sport
and soma, by the scandalous
unorthodoxy of his sex life, by his refusal to obey the teachings o four
Ford and behave out of office hours, ‘even as a
little infant, ‘ (here the Director made the sign of
the T), ‘he has proved himself as an enemy of Society.”
(Huxley 149).
Clearly this is not something that is going to bring happiness to
Bernard, the man who the Director accused here.
Bernard’s freedom is controlled, and he pushes its boundaries, resulting
in himself acquiring the label of public enemy.
The State believes him a threat to the comfort and serene stability of
people’s lives.
Aldous
Huxley wrote Brave New World as an argument for individualism, as
demonstrated by the discontent of individuals in a technologically controlled
society, the fact that people are not truly living the human experience, and that
their freedom is sacrificed for health and comfort. He
demonstrates that when technology
overrules society, individualism is lost.
All of these points convey the need for individualism, for it brings
freedom, true human experience, and contentment. Because
individualism benefits humans
universally, Huxley argued this by writing Brave New World.
Works
Cited
Huxley, Aldous.
Brave New World. New York:
HarperPerennial, 1998.
Huxley, Aldous.
“Individuality.” Proverbia.
<http://en.proverbia.net/citastema.asp?from=1&ntema=Individuality&tematica=619>
Magill
Frank, Harr-Low. Critical Survey of
Long Fiction. New Jersey; Salem
Press Inc., 1983.
Moody
William Vaughn, Morss Lovett Robert and Fred B.
Millet. A History of English
Literature. New York: Charles
Scribner’s Sons, 1956.
O’Neil,
Patrick M. Great World Writers:
Twentieth Century. New York:
Marshall Cavendish, 2004.